More On "After Birth Abortions"

Here’s more on the controversial bioethicists who believe in “after birth abortions.”

Bioethics After Birth Abortions: Killing Non Persons

Dr. Francesca Minerva and Alberto Giubilini released and article to The Journal of Medical Ethics where they were quite blunt on how to approach life going forward. It’s almost refreshing to hear people speak frankly on the side of death. Here is what they say:

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled. more

The Killing Double Standard - Beware If You Have A Disability

The war against people with disabilities continues. Read this and see how the killing of the "defective" unborn child was obviously less of a trouble than killing it's "normal" twin. Horrific.

Medical bungle at Royal Women's Hospital kills healthy fetus

A HEALTHY 32-week-old fetus was accidentally terminated in a botched procedure at the Royal Women's Hospital.

A Victorian mother, pregnant with twin boys she had already named, had made the agonising decision to abort one of the babies on doctors' advice.

She had been told that one twin had a congenital heart defect that would require years of operations, if he survived at all.

An ultrasound clinician had checked the healthy baby, who was in a separate sac to the sick baby, before the termination.

But just after 2.30pm on Tuesday the wrong baby was injected, terminating the healthy pregnancy. more

Doing Away With Down Syndrome - Maybe

Well yes, the murder of children with Down Syndrome is well under way and has been for years. While figures vary slightly, about 9 out of 10 babies with DS are aborted. This piece explains why this might not actually end DS in the workld.

A World Without People With Down Syndrome? At What Price?

One of the great philosophical divisions of our time is between those who believe progress is steadily making mankind happier, healthier, and all-around better; and those who believe human nature is basically constant, with new developments just as capable of yielding evil as they are good. Both worldviews collide in a recent New York Post story on a new method of testing for Down Syndrome: more

The UK War On Children With Disabilities

You may not know that unborn children with disabilities are routinely aborted in the UK - even for minor and easily correctable "imperfections" like cleft palate. Of course, the pro-deathers in the British Government want to keep under wraps how many children with disabilities are killed (hint: many more than anyone could guess). However, they have just lost in the British High Court, and presumably must now make those figures public. Prediction: There'll be much more effort from the pro-deathers to keep this quiet. Why? because this is eugenics that even Hitler would have been proud of.

Release the figures on late abortions, orders High Court

Figures on late abortions of ‘less than perfect’ foetuses must be released to the public, the High Court has ruled.

Campaigners claimed victory last night in a long-running secrecy row with the Government over terminations of embryos diagnosed with conditions such as club foot and cleft palate. more