Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Yes, there Really Is A Slippery Slope

Here's an excellent piece on the legitimacy of the slippery slope argument.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Vol. 21, No. 4, 379–404 © 2011 by The Johns Hopkins University Press
David Albert Jones
Is There a Logical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Nonvoluntary Euthanasia?
ABSTRACT. John Keown has constructed a logical slippery slope argument from voluntary euthanasia (VAE) to nonvoluntary euthanasia (NVAE). VAE if justified implies that death can be of overall benefit, in which case it should also be facilitated in those who cannot consent (NVAE). Hallvard Lillehammer asserts that Keown’s arguments rests on a fallacy. However, pace Lillehammer, it can be restated to escape this fallacy. Its validity is confirmed by applying  to VAE some well-established general principles of medical decision making. Thus, either VAE and NVAE must be accepted together or, if NVAE is regarded as unacceptable, VAE should also be rejected. more

No comments:

Locations of visitors to this page